(gradient)+(2).png?width=538&name=Juristat_Primary+(white+text)(gradient)+(2).png "Juristat | Patent analytics & workflow automation")
(gradient).png?width=538&name=Juristat_Primary+(grey+text)(gradient).png "Juristat | Patent analytics & workflow automation")
When examiners put off work until the end of the quarter, it can have a dramatic impact on both workloads for the law firm, as well as chances of success for the patent application. The USPTO has an official term for this examiner procrastination - end-loading.
How can understanding examiner procrastination work to your advantage in patent prosecution? In this recorded webinar, we discuss:
- How Juristat calculates end-loading rates and related metrics
- The impact end-loading has on OA volume and prosecution strategy
- Which examiners procrastinate the most and get more difficult at the end of the quarter
- And which assignees are most impacted by end-loading
Sign up to access our webinar, How End-Loading Impacts Your Organization:
Companies Most Impacted by Procrastinating Examiners at the USPTO
The USPTO has an official term for examiner procrastination – end-loading. When examiners put off work until the end of the quarter, it can have a dramatic impact on both workloads for the law firm and chances of success for the patent application.
Read more →
Examiners Who Procrastinate the Most (2021)
The USPTO has an official term for examiner procrastination - end-loading. An interesting metric to be sure, but how can you use examiner procrastination to your advantage in patent prosecution?
Read more →
.jpg "examiner office actions")
Examiners Who Issue the Most Office Actions (2021)
An ideal patent prosecution is quick, cost-efficient, and ultimately successful. The more office actions an application receives, the longer, more expensive, and less viable an application becomes.
Read more →