CASE STUDY
Finding a Partner for Success
Juristat Office Action Response is a revolutionary tool that automates IP workflows using advanced legal technology and artificial intelligence, setting a new standard in the industry. Learn how a top patent firm is deploying Juristat to:
- Minimize the cost and time spent preparing OA responses
- Reduce errors and increase quality
- Boost productivity without compromising the caliber of work
Case Study
Finding a Partner for Success
Manual processes are no match for high volumes of office actions from the USPTO. Learn how top patent firms are deploying Juristat to:
- Minimize the cost and time spent preparing OA responses
- Reduce errors and increase quality
- Boost productivity without compromising the caliber of work
Case Study
The Game-Changing Impact of Juristat Office Action Response
Manual preparation of office action responses, long the norm in the patent field, is no longer sufficient. In this case study, learn how Quarles & Brady uses Juristat OAR to minimize the cost and time delay of manual preparation of OA responses, leverage staff for billable tasks, and increase revenue.
REPORT
Examiner End-loading at the USPTO [2022 Report]
The habit of some USPTO examiners putting off work until the end of the quarter can up-end your patent practice. We explore the origins of the term, name the examiners guilty of procrastination, and identify those who get easier or more difficult at the end of the quarter.
Download Juristat's exclusive report and arm yourself with the numbers and nuance to protect your patent practice.
ARTICLE
Nicholson De Vos Uses Data to Support Strategy and Client Relations
We’ve all been there. Prosecution is taking longer than expected. You’re facing one rejection after another. And your client is starting to question whether this patent is worth pursuing.
This precarious position is where Jonathan Miller of Nicholson De Vos Webster & Elliott LLP found himself during a recent prosecution.
Here's what our clients have to say:
“I appreciate Juristat's customer service. The chat feature is always touted, and I can certainly see why."
— Nathanael Ashton-Piper, Marketing and Social Media Coordinator, Patterson Thuente IP
"If we are going to bring on a new firm, the first thing we do is look at their metrics for the types of cases we are planning to give them. If their metrics are good, that’s a big plus. If their metrics are bad, that’s going to pretty seriously impact my judgment."
— David Simon, Senior Vice President, Intellectual Property at Salesforce
“Using Juristat Analytics in our decision-making process helps us obtain the most valuable claim scope for our clients in the most efficient way."
— Gavin J. O'Keefe, Partner, McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
“Being able to view examiner allowance rates, and more importantly, have those broken down by individual action and rejection type, allows us to be prepared to effectively plan an office action response . . . In short, we would definitely recommend Juristat for any patent practitioners.”
— Jeffrey Schox, Partner, Schox PLC
“Information is often only usable when it’s actionable and explainable. Juristat’s graphics make it easy for me not only to see the course of action to suggest but to explain to a client why."
— Kirk Damman, Partner, Lewis Rice
“When responding to RFPs, finding the right stats to answer detailed questions is time-consuming. Juristat helped us find what we needed in a couple of hours, and our response is much more strategic than it would have been without the data.”
— Kaitlyn Schnackenberg, Department Marketing Manager at Polsinelli
BLOG
Patent analysis and insight
Analysis and insight to bring more predictability, transparency, and equity to your patent prosecution.
Sign up for our newsletter.
Get the latest Juristat news and insight delivered right to your inbox.